18 July 2012

Profile Howlers and Wowsers

Intentional Humour?

Your public awaits you and your almost perfect profile is ready to be unleashed, or is it?  Surely you would not compose and send off a Curriculum Vitae to a potential employer without checking it?  Well pay the same sort attention to detail on your profile and make sure your public is laughing WITH you as opposed to at you!


The moral of this chapter is to be aware of how your profile reads!  Sometimes it is simply incorrect punctuation which causes the howlers (and sometimes it is the reader's wicked imagination of which you have no control).


E from Cambridgeshire:
I am just as happy to stay in hold hands and watch TV. 
I imagine E is trying to imply he is tactile as opposed to actually sitting at home clasping his hands as he watches the television alone.



M from Huntingdon
Have a car: N/A
Am financially stable, got my own place, car and all the other trappings. 
Something does not quite match up.




L from Oxfordshire:
I'm looking for Mrs Right to share these things with.
I imagine L would like to meet a singleton and make her his Mrs as opposed to stealing another man's wife.
Likewise - D from Bishop's Stortford.



E from Essex
Looking for a sexy smile and good times together.
My sexy smile and I always have good times together... don't yours?



N from Spalding
Enjoy a good night out but equally as happy having a night in with a bottle of wine and quality time together.
I cannot imagine that N's intention is actually to have quality time with his bottle of wine.




R from Essex
I'm more of a comfortable traveller but I have been known to camp!
This is purely my twisted mind for I have images of John Inman.

L from Northamptonshire
Northants guy with own house and no ties seeks funny normal pretty lady for fun and friendship.
The picture of the guy does indeed show him without a tie... not sure he meant that though.

D from Milton Keynes
Just so I conform I like eating out real English beer motorbikes.
Is that a motorbike made from beer, and how does one eat it or perhaps out of it?


M from Bourne
I don't need to drink heavily to have a good time - most of the time I'm driving so stick to coke and orange juice.
Is coke and orange juice a good mix?  I can imagine the colour is gross.

N from Stofold
Dislikes- Marrow, what is the point of this vegetable?
Marrow has a point? No wonder he doesn't like it.




K from Luton
Looking for my Yin Yang
Is that the same as asking for a threesome or a he-she?



M from Bedford
I bring good things to a relationship
I wonder if that is like a dowry.  Certainly intriguing.


F from Pakistan
Status: not single, not looking
Intent: Dating!


H from Northampton
Profession: Proffesional
I liken this error to the self-professed "inteligent" person (AND I am ignoring the fact that a professional, unless you're Bodie or Doyle, is not a profession). 




J from Peterborough
Like eating out country side the beach love cliff tops walks.
That is such an unusual diet (oh it's lacking punctuation silly me).



B from Ely
Take her down are local for a slap up fish and chip meal.
There the danger lies spelling words how you pronounce them. 

C from Milton Keynes
Enjoys most things in life as lif is too short.
That typo or Freudian slip is rather humorous.






Photographic Faux Pas





N from Herts
Status: single 
Photo: with wedding ring!












H from Leamington Spa
Status: blond Caucasian
Photo: bald!
Hair colour for the mature male is often inaccurate.  Photos blatantly show salt and pepper or grey, not black/brown/blond.






S from Peterborough
Status: non-smoker
Photo: cigarette in hand!






S from Peterborough
Photo: of two men
No other pictures, so who is S?


Ladies from anywhere
Average body type
Photo: women's view of average seems to range from a size 10 to a size 20.  According to this article the average dress size in Britain is a size 16.  According to this article it was a size 14 in the year 2000 and a 12 a decade earlier.


Anyone from anywhere
The fun-seeking and cheerful members whose photos depict the opposite.


Other Surprises

B from Hertford
48
I am looking to start my own family
As a mother of five I am pretty maternal, even to this day.  My age, however, dictates my biological clock has run out (due to risks to a potential embryo/foetus).  Now this gentleman is one of a growing trend: already past middle-aged and wanting to start or extend a family.  If he sires with a younger woman the risk fore-mentioned is much less or negligible.  This makes him far more fortunate than a woman of his own age group, but surely other factors need to be taken into consideration, such as age and health?  Consider the father's age as the child grows up.  Chances are he will live to a ripe old age since demographically we are becoming a nation top heavy with elderly people, but will B still have reasonable health and how comparable will he be to other fathers of twenty to thirty years his junior?  A trite example perhaps, but would he be able to play football with his son in his teens, when he is in his sixties?  B will be a pensioner before he could take his child for her first legal drink.
B from Luton
49
Wants to extend his family


A from Coventry
Looking for real love. Someone I can call my mum, my soulmate, my sister and my lover
Okay is it me, or is this scary?  Can we just stick with the 'best friends' comments rather then include female relatives?

Markymark from anywhere
Is an extremely frequent user name.

N from Luton
My colleges at work say I am good looking kind caring and good fun,so who am i to disagree...?
I imagine N is not referring to those institutions for higher education, but in fact his colleagues.  I later found out his 12 year old daughter composed his profile.  N had her correct it when the error was pointed out.  I was later horrified to learn she may have communicated with a potential datee or two.  


Profile Wisdom 

E from King's Lynn
Sorry ladies, no pics, no can do! I just do not understand why so many women on here don't have a picture of themselves unless they have something to hide maybe??? If we are all honest deep down, it starts with the picture first, and then if you are not completely repulsed, then we read the profile to get to know a bit more. Don't shoot the messenger :) Just telling it as it is...

J from Nottingham
Why is it that people put as there main profile pictures where: 
They don't smile
Group photos
Distance shots
Pictures of animals!!!


M from Cambridge
Please accept my apologies if I don't reply, I do appreciate any message, but I don't wish to confuse or to 'lead on' in any way, so feel it best to just keep it simple by being silent rather than getting into a series of polite replies...anyway thanks and good luck. 


C from New York
PHYSICAL ATTRACTION & COMPATIBLITY are key for me – As it should be with everyone I hope.
I read all messages that are sent to me and read the sender's profile.
If I don't respond it is because I do not believe I am a match for one of those two reasons listed previously.













2 July 2012

Philosophy - Pursuing Happiness

Think Outside The Box

Ever read something, heard something or had a thought enter your mind for you to disregard as too ridiculous to be true, only to find years later you are drawn to that very idea?

For thousands of years man has been evolving and thinking.  He has been passing on weird and wonderful thoughts that our personal fabric of life has us accepting, disregarding or yearning to know more about.

Being taught about the concept of reincarnation as a school-child intrigued me, but it was not a philosophy I could absorb and take into my very being.  Yet now I am happy to acknowledge previous lives and am determined, similarly like Hindus and Buddhists, to escape that very cycle of rebirth.  Within a year of my eldest daughter's birth I watched her commune with the unseen and within months of the birth of my youngest daughter I came to believe, from observing unlearned behaviour, she was an old soul.  Interestingly these two children (out of five) were unplanned.  


It may appear as though I lean towards Eastern philosophy.  In fact I  have begun to embrace both Eastern and Western thought, just as I embrace emotion and rationale (seen generally as feminine and masculine traits respectively), ego and higher self,  and physical and the metaphysical realities.  My belief takes a dualism approach (a state of two parts) which, through balance, leads to monism (a state of "oneness", of unity, of interconnectedness).  

Let us take a peek at wisdom through the ages and across the continents.  In this chapter we are looking at:

Pursuing Happiness


Many philosophers discuss the idea of hedonism, their ideas vary and consequently result in different types.  Socrates (c.469-399BC) states (through Plato c.429-347BC) that we are all hedonists: aspiring to maximise our pleasure and minimise our pain.  He saw pleasure as good and pain as bad.  In his view this is not hedonism in the sense of pleasure for one at the expense of others, or an indulgence of immediate pleasures without considering long term consequences.  In fact it is the opposite as Socrates believed that via knowledge we could be both virtuous and happy, and that bad is only committed through ignorance.  He publicly encouraged people to regularly scrutinise their lives philosophically. 


Moving on to the not-so-distant past we have Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) advocating correct moral behaviour through collective happiness.  Quoting from the above link: Bentham’s greatest happiness principle states that actions are immoral if they are not the action that appears to maximise the happiness of all the people likely to be affected.  His main slant for measuring pleasure for the individual was through the aspect of pleasure's intensity, duration and quantity.  The quality of the source of the pleasure was largely ignored due to its subjective nature, this is shown in Hayden's "You Kant Make It Up" example of Dan Brown (highly successful present day author) versus William Shakespeare (literary legend).  Bentham's student John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), however, argued for the quality aspect of pleasure.  He differentiated quality into lower and higher pleasures: lower pleasures which satisfy our basic physical needs being the animals we are (such as food and sex - and, a note from your Devi: sometimes enjoyably coupled) and higher pleasures, assumed as uniquely human, which satisfy our minds, (such as enjoyment of the opera, poetry, art, friendship and virtuousness).  This view had been brought about due to Mill suffering a period of mental illness as a young man.  He believed it was through the higher pleasure of reading poetry by William Wordsworth that lifted the depression.


For those of you interested in mental health issues, in particular depression, there are biological, psychological and social aspects of the condition.  Depression nowadays is treated (or should be) according to all these factors.  The NHS (British National Health Service) can prescribe medications and refer to talking therapies; exercise, proper nutrition and sleep hygiene are all encouraged; and, a sufferer's support networks should be looked into.  Mill would actually have benefited from a combination of his "higher and lower pleasures". As he discovered, occupying the mind is incredibly beneficial, but dependent upon the severity of the depression, this may not be an immediate possibility.


Mill was not the first philosopher to advocate higher pleasures.  Epicurus (341-270BC) placed greater value on intellectual pleasure over and above physical pleasure.  Happiness, in his view, was measured by the absence of pain (especially mental), the moderation of physical desires and the cultivation of friendships.  He took a broad look at life and recognised that some instantaneous pleasure pursuits later developed into pain (such as a heavy consumption of alcohol or food) and therefore should be avoided.  Having suffered much ill-health Epicurus rationalised that experiencing physical pain was a lesser evil than experiencing mental anguish because physical pain was of the present whereas mental anguish could revile time in the form of past hauntings, present psychological trauma and fear of the future.  


Not all hedonism emerges overtly.  Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) has suggested that benevolent acts are not as selfless as they first seem.  In fact they too can be hedonistic for they meet the desires and needs of such charitable people.  These acts are grounded in self-interest. You may like to note this can be linked to the article of co-dependence on my Bibliography page if benevolence requires reward/praise/affirmation in its hedonistic pursuit.  On the opposite side of this paradoxical coin Ayn Rand (1905-1982) described selfishness as a virtue.  She (yes finally a female voice in this male dominated area) subscribed to the egoist* view of the right to pursue one's own happiness, motivated by one's own rational interests and desires.  Ayn was not interested in desires driven by whims or emotions, but desires through the faculty of reasoning.  


When one acts according to their own interests and desires, this selfishness is only negative when it incurs the sacrifice of others to the self.  In some small way in the world of dating we can infer the negative connotation from profiles of people stating something on the lines of "I want someone to make me happy".  No person can make another happy, it has to come from within.  We have to take the responsibility of our own happiness.

*Egoism is not to be confused with egotism - the self-inflating of one's own importance.



According to Siddhartha Gautama (b.6th century BC), known as The (supreme) Buddha, nothing is permanent and as such all is transitory:  pleasure may lead to pain, success may lead to failure or dissatisfaction, and life leads to death (which then leads to rebirth). Happiness is only a fleeting state as life is suffering.  We have no control over these things but we can learn to control how our mind reacts*.  Gautama composed his Eightfold Path as the route to end all suffering (including the cycle of rebirth) with the attainment of Nirvana.  This lifestyle choice, even even two and a half millennia later, can assist the integrated development of knowledge, and moral and emotional behaviours.


*I learned many years ago that you cannot change the past but you can change how it affects your present.  A few years ago I attended several meditation sessions at my local Buddhist centre.  It is something I would happily do regularly should my work pattern ever permit it.  All faiths are welcome.  In a world which is fast-paced and often chaotic, this is a haven of tranquillity. 






So what is the message here?

I am of the opinion it is perfectly acceptable to have hedonistic beliefs, ie: to seek pleasure for ourselves with the minimum amount of pain.  Like Epicurus I would suggest you look at the bigger picture and hence consider future consequences.  A lifestyle of vice such as gluttony or promiscuity may initially be fun, but eventually could have severe health implications.  I do not believe Socrates was wrong when he declared we are all hedonists (even those amongst us who are altruistic and/or benevolent).  However,  since we are not all as virtuous as Socrates would have us believe (even after acquiring knowledge), consideration should be given to the way pleasure is sought.  My advice would be to seek pleasure for ourselves but where we may also achieve pleasure for others, at the minimum of expense to all concerned.  Although immeasurable this can magnify or prolong our pleasure; consider when you have made someone laugh or prevented them from feeling pain, did you not notice your pleasure receptors swell?


Let us put a modern twist on things: you are in a marriage where sex is but a distant memory.  Your relationship with your partner is more like a business relationship: you both deal with the financial and household chores and are even polite over breakfast, but gone are the days of bodice-ripping.  You join a dating site, one which endorses intimate encounters - you desire the pleasure of another person's body upon yours.  The instant pleasures are obvious should you successfully meet a like-minded person, but are you up for the possible long-term consequences?  Consequences such as a traumatic end to the marriage, disputes over child arrangements, and disruption of relationships with close friends and extended family.  Could you not have sought pleasure through the seduction of your own partner, seeking what once thrilled the pair of you?  If the marriage cannot be revitalised then communicate with your partner as to whether it has any value continuing.  Your partner may actually surprise you in also wanting the release from the marital bond, hence seeking numerous intimate encounters becomes an option without the burden of deceit. Quite clearly this latter action follows the premise of: seek pleasure for ourselves but where we may also achieve pleasure for others, at the minimum of expense to all concerned.